| Return to
Christian-Attorney.Net Return to Corporal Punishment in California ARE PARENTS LIABLE FOR THEIR
CHILDREN’S TORTS OR
CRIMES? “Tort” means a legally actionable civil
wrong. Usually no
contract is involved. Examples
include vehicular collisions,
negligently or intentionally caused injuries, libel, slander, and many
others. “Joint and
several liability”
means that: (1) More than one
party is liable; and (2) The creditor or victim can recover all damages
from
just one party separately or from all parties jointly. “Minor” means a child under the age of eighteen years. “Parent” means parent(s) or
guardian(s) who have custody and
control over the child. GENERAL RULE – NO TORT LIABILITY
STATUTORY EXCEPTIONS However, parents and minor are
jointly and several
liable (along with the minor) for the minor’s torts or crimes, as
follows: Licensed
Driver (Vehicle Code
§17707, §17709, §360): If a minor driver causes
injury, death, and/or property damage on a public road, then the parent
is also
liable. But the
parent is liable up to: Injury damages: $15,000 per person; or
$30,000 for two or more persons; A concerned parent can
revoke the application signature and the minor will lose his or her
license (Vehicle Code §17711) No liability attaches if
minor was driving within the scope of his or her employment or agency (Vehicle Code §17710)
Learner’s
Permit Driver (Vehicle Code Section 12509):
$30,000 for two or more persons;
Graffiti
Abatement Costs (Government
Code Section 38772):
Attorney's fees;
Graffiti removal costs;
Repair and replacement costs of defaced property; and
Law enforcement costs incurred identifying and apprehending the minor.
Truancy fines (Ed.C §
48264.5(d)(2)): Curfew violations (W&IC § 625.5(e)): Parents must pay administrative and transportation costs incurred by police for picking up and returning children to their homes on a second violation.
STATUTORY LIABILITY FOR CHILD’S CRIME
Contributing
to Delinquency of a Minor: (Penal
Code § 272; Williams v. Garcetti
(1993) 5 Cal. 4th 561):
If a parent or guardian
contributes to the delinquency of a minor through grossly
[aggravated, reckless] unreasonable care, supervision,
protection, and control over
the minor child, the parent may be
punished. Punishment is a fine not
to exceed $2500 and/or imprisonment of no more than one year. However,
enforcement is generally instead obtained through parenting classes and
counseling. Criminal penalties likely
only in those cases in which the parent’s culpability
is great and causation
is clear. Parents who know or
reasonably should know that their child is at risk of delinquency can
be
punished. Parents who take
reasonable steps to control their child and are not successful will not
likely
be charged. Shoplifting (Penal Code §490.5): If a minor child stole merchandise from a store (“merchant’s premises”) or from a library facility, then the parent is also liable. Parental liability is limited to $500 (in addition to any other liability the parents might have for failing to prevent their child’s criminal activity).
Minor
convicted of a crime (Welfare
and
Institutions Code §730.7(a),(d); In
re Michael S (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th
1443, 1449-1450):
If a minor is convicted of
a crime, the parent is liable for damages.
Liability is limited to the amounts stated in Civil Code §1714.1 and §1714.3 above. Furthermore, damages are
limited to economic
type damages [i.e., replace or repair property; medical expenses; loss
profits
or wages – See W.I.C. § 730.6(h),(j)] Rebuttable
Presumption: Parents must pay the damages unless they prove that they
don’t
have the financial means to do so.
NON STATUTORY LIABILITY – NO
DOLLAR LIMITS Parents are civilly liable with
the minor for the
minor’s torts, as follows: Notice
of Dangerous propensities [Robertson v. Wentz (1986)
187 Cal.App.3d
1281; Singer v. Marx (1956) 144 Cal.App.2d 637; Reida
v. Lund (1971)18
Cal.App.3d 698; Ellis v. D'Angelo
(1953) 116 Cal.App.2d 310; Costello v.
Hart (1972) 23 Cal.App.3d 898]: Parents on notice (who know or reasonably should know – usually from prior actions) of their child’s dangerous propensities are liable for failure to take reasonable efforts to protect others by supervising, restraining and/or correcting the child or warning others of the danger. The
absence of such
ability to control the child is fatal to a claim of legal
responsibility.
Disclaimer: The information provided in this article is informational, only. The subject matter and applicable law is evolving and/or constant state of change. No legal advice is given and no attorney/client or other relationship is established or intended. The information provided is from general sources, and I cannot represent, guarantee or warrant that the information contained in this website is accurate, current, or is appropriate for the usage of any reader. It is recommend that readers of this information consult with their own legal counsel prior to relying on any information on this website. © 2010
Return to
Christian-Attorney.NetReturn to Corporal Punishment in California |